Before kick-off: define the sample first
| Outcome | matches | Share |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil wins | 0 | — |
| Draws | 0 | — |
| Haiti wins | 0 | — |
FactUsing the explicit scope of completed 2026 World Cup matches before kick-off, the teams had met 0 times: 0 Brazil wins, 0 draws and 0 Haiti wins. This is not presented as an all-time record.
FactThe comparison direction on this page is fixed: Brazil is the recorded home side, Haiti the away side, and 3–0 is stored in that order. A later meeting would remain a separate event record.
Personnel: how the starting XI changed
FactBrazil changed 2 starters from its previous match; Haiti changed 2 starters. Continuity is calculated from confirmed starters only.
FactBrazil's new starters include Danilo, Matheus Cunha; Haiti's new starters include Jean-Kévin Duverne, Josué Casimir. The names connect the continuity count to specific personnel.
The result: 3–0 and the decisive sequence
FactThe final score was Brazil 3–0 Haiti. The verified scoring sequence was 23′ Matheus Cunha、36′ Matheus Cunha、45′ Vinícius Júnior. Score, sequence and line-up changes are facts; the mechanism inferred from them is labelled as analysis.
FactThe verification index for Brazil versus Haiti fixes four fields: the 3–0 final score, the 2026 FIFA World Cup · Group C stage, the Lincoln Financial Field location and 3 scoring events. Together they identify this match without borrowing context from another fixture.
FactNode 1: Matheus Cunha scored for Brazil in minute 23, setting the ledger at 1–0; Node 2: Matheus Cunha scored for Brazil in minute 36, setting the ledger at 2–0; Node 3: Vinícius Júnior scored for Brazil in minute 45, setting the ledger at 3–0
FactBrazil's location key for this match is Lincoln Financial Field, shared by Haiti; Brazil's 3 goals and Haiti's 0 goals belong only to this venue and kick-off record.
Why this result made sense
AnalysisBrazil versus Haiti, 3–0: Brazil converted the lead into the result. Aggregated player data shows a shot gap of 1 and a pass-completion gap of 4.8 percentage points; game-state management mattered more than any single possession number.