Before kick-off: define the sample first

OutcomematchesShare
Switzerland wins0
Draws0
Algeria wins0

FactUsing the explicit scope of completed 2026 World Cup matches before kick-off, the teams had met 0 times: 0 Switzerland wins, 0 draws and 0 Algeria wins. This is not presented as an all-time record.

FactThe comparison direction on this page is fixed: Switzerland is the recorded home side, Algeria the away side, and 2–0 is stored in that order. A later meeting would remain a separate event record.

Personnel: how the starting XI changed

FactSwitzerland changed 2 starters from its previous match; Algeria changed 3 starters. Continuity is calculated from confirmed starters only.

FactSwitzerland's new starters include Denis Zakaria, Dan Ndoye; Algeria's new starters include Luca Zidane, Rayan Aït-Nouri, Ramiz Zerrouki. The names connect the continuity count to specific personnel.

The result: 2–0 and the decisive sequence

10′
Breel Embolo changes the score1–0; assisted by Johan Manzambi
46′
Dan Ndoye changes the score2–0

FactThe final score was Switzerland 2–0 Algeria. The verified scoring sequence was 10′ Breel Embolo、46′ Dan Ndoye. Score, sequence and line-up changes are facts; the mechanism inferred from them is labelled as analysis.

FactThe verification index for Switzerland versus Algeria fixes four fields: the 2–0 final score, the 2026 FIFA World Cup · Round of 32 stage, the BC Place location and 2 scoring events. Together they identify this match without borrowing context from another fixture.

FactNode 1: Breel Embolo scored for Switzerland in minute 10, setting the ledger at 1–0; Node 2: Dan Ndoye scored for Switzerland in minute 46, setting the ledger at 2–0

FactSwitzerland's location key for this match is BC Place, shared by Algeria; Switzerland's 2 goals and Algeria's 0 goals belong only to this venue and kick-off record.

Why this result made sense

AnalysisSwitzerland versus Algeria, 2–0: Switzerland converted the lead into the result. Aggregated player data shows a shot gap of 3 and a pass-completion gap of 3.8 percentage points; game-state management mattered more than any single possession number.

Evidence confidence92%